Letters in Chinese

李察通訊 Letters in Chinese
https://leecha.blogspot.hk/

8/27/2024

what is the meaning of 肉 ?



Its a huge display in Youth Square,  Chai Wan, Hong Kong.

Don't miss it if you care about the future of our country.


ref:

http://leechardasks.blogspot.com/2024/04/why-should-young-people-scared-in-youth.html



8/24/2024

How big are the secret hands on the internet?

  


(An revised article)

 (2024.8.24)


The Song Dynasty was an absolutely sad dynasty.  Liang Qichao said that every time he read the history of the Song Dynasty, he would be extremely sad.


Wang Anshi is a rare reformer through the ages. He wants to reform and strengthen everything to build a new China.  But every reform he proposed met fierce opposition from the old party.  The old party spread all over the country, and Wang Anshi's new policies also required local officials of the old party to implement them.  They are all there everywhere in  upper and lower places. How can the New Deal be successful if the old party members were totally in control?


What Wang Anshi changed was the law, but he didn't mention the heart.  A reform requires a change of heart. Without the support of the people, relying on a mere decree is bound to fail.


But this heart is definitely not a momentary public opinion, or press opinion.  It is a comprehensive reform of the ideological system, a complete change of the world outlook and outlook on life.


On the other hand, Wang Anshi did not follow the popular line.  The masses have never been mobilized, and the trend of thought has not risen. How can bad habits be eliminated?  His reliance on a small number of officials and bureaucrats was also the reason for his failure.


In today's situation, the old party has become a secret underground party.  They secretly contacted the masses, took the mass line, and established a secret underground network. This underground party, from top to bottom, controlled the hearts of the people by invisible hands.  And this hand was stretched out from far away America.  The Americans once thought that Hong Kong could be dug out with just this hand.  They absolutely don't know that it is impossible for this secret hand to overthrow the tide.  The events in Hong Kong a few years ago made people aware of this sneaky hand.  Once the problem is known, there will be solutions.


One is the ideological system, the other is the mass line, and both are indispensable.

Regarding the secret mass line of the underground party, there is one thing that cannot be overlooked. This type of 'mass line' is nurtured in the shadows by the ocean-like internet. A certain singer's song suddenly becomes a huge hit. It is said that the online 'click rate' is astronomical. At first glance, it can be quite shocking. However, after some time, when one calms down and listens again, doubts begin to arise. Is that astronomical number real? Or has someone secretly manipulated the figures to create a false number and generate a negative atmosphere?

Problem may not be in the song itself. Problem is the secret promoter.

If this is indeed fabrication, the issue cannot be avoided. Just how much power does the underground party have on the internet?


From promoting indulgence to expressing helplessness, it raises further suspicion that the high-profile propaganda on the internet, along with countless small falsehoods, all serve the same purpose.




宋朝的新舊黨爭和今日有何不同?(2024.8.24修訂)


宋朝是一個絕對悲哀的朝代。梁啟超說,他每次閱讀宋史,都會大慟。

王安石是一個千古難得的改革家,他要變法圖強,建立一個新的中國。但是他所提出的每一項改革,都遭受到舊黨的激烈反對。舊黨遍佈全國,王安石的新政,也都需要舊黨的地方官去推行。上上下下,全是一丘之貉。苟且因循,新政怎可能成功?

王安石變的是法,但並沒有提到心。變法必先變心,沒有民心的支持,只靠一紙政令,必定失敗。

但這個心也絕不是一時的民意,或者輿論之類。而是思想系統的全盤改革,是宇宙觀和人生觀的徹底變更。

另一方面,王安石也沒有走民眾路線。群眾從未有動員起來,思潮未起,惡習怎能去除?他依賴少數仕大夫官僚,也是失敗的原因。

今日形勢,舊黨已經變成祕密的地下黨。他們在暗中聯絡群眾,走群眾路線,建立了暗中的地下網絡,這個地下黨,從上至下,民心受制於無形之手。而這隻手,是從遙遠的美國伸過來的。美國人曾經以為,只靠這隻手便可以把香港挖出去。他們絕對不知道,這隻秘密的手,是不可能推倒大潮流的。香港在幾年前的事變,使人覺察了這隻偷偷摸摸的手。問題知道了,必定有辦法的。

一個是思想系統,一個是群眾路線,兩者缺一不可。

關於地下黨的祕密群眾路線,還有一點是不可不留意到的。這一種「群眾路線」,是被海洋般的互聯網在陰暗中䕶育的。某一位歌手的歌,忽然大紅大紫。據説網上的「點擊率」是天文數字。初聽之下,有㸃震懾。但隔了一段時間,冷靜下來再聽,便開始產生了懷疑。到底那天文數字是真的?還是有人在暗中做了手腳,泡制一個假數字出來,制造負面氣氛?

問題未必在於這首歌。問題是底下的祕密力量在推動。

如果這是真的做假,問題就不宜迥避了。地下黨在互聯網中的勢力,到底有多大?

從鼓吹吃喝到宣講無奈,更令人懷疑,互聯網中的嚇人大宣傳,還有無量數的小虛假,都是同一目的。

 


參考:

王安石答司馬諫議書

(李察按:此文曾被不明來歴者暗中刪削。今再刊一次。2024.8.24)


某啟:

昨日蒙教,竊以為與君實游處相好之日久,而議事每不合,所操之術多異故也。雖欲強聒,終必不蒙見察,故略上報,不復一一自辨。重念蒙君實視遇厚,於反覆不宜鹵莽,故今具道所以,冀君實或見恕也。

蓋儒者所爭,尤在名實,名實已明,而天下之理得矣。今君實所以見教者,以為侵官、生事、征利、拒諫,以致天下怨謗也。某則以謂:受命於人主,議法度而修之於朝廷,以授之於有司,不為侵官;舉先王之政,以興利除弊,不為生事;為天下理財,不為征利;辟邪說,難壬人,不為拒諫。至於怨誹之多,則固前知其如此也。

人習於苟且非一日,士大夫多以不恤國事、同俗自媚於眾為善,上乃欲變此,而某不量敵之眾寡,欲出力助上以抗之,則眾何為而不洶洶然?盤庚之遷,胥怨者民也,非特朝廷士大夫而已。盤庚不為怨者故改其度,度義而後動,是而不見可悔故也。如君實責我以在位久,未能助上大有為,以膏澤斯民,則某知罪矣;如曰今日當一切不事事,守前所為而已,則非某之所敢知。

無由會晤,不任區區嚮往之至。


8/18/2024

What is the most important issue?



Almost all the information is contained in this article. Not only is the political atmosphere clear, but even the underlying issue has emerged vividly. Normally, this kind of issue is not spoken of and is rarely acknowledged. However, with the current atmosphere, it forces you to accept it.

What is the most important issue?

Is it that university presidents were forced to resign?(a total of five) Is it that private online chats among several deans were unexpectedly discovered? With just one phrase—"Amazing is what $$$$ can do"—these deans were caught, compelled to take leave, and ultimately dismissed.

There is also the power to summon anyone for hearings at any time, where the inquiry is not about any wrongdoing but solely about your thoughts. Not even your thoughts, but merely the "tendencies" of your thoughts.

However—

Please note, the above is not the key point. The above is not important.

The key point is a matter of a thousand times greater importance.

This one monumental issue is far more significant than any other major international incident.

The entire global situation has already been turned upside down by this issue.

What issue?

That is: the secret powers controlled by Israeli consortiums have completely taken over the United States. Where the U.S. is heading has been clearly and definitively confirmed.

What direction?

To sever China's branches(Iran, Russia, etc.) piece by piece, stripping away its leaves(writers, artists,singers) and peeling off its soul(eating drinking playing and sex). Economic warfare comes first, with localized conflicts and wars running parallel, and the ultimate goal—

if you don’t believe it, that’s fine. 

Because you will no longer exist.





差不多所有的信息都在這篇文章裡面了。 不僅是政治氣氛,連潛在的真相都非常清楚的跳出來了。平常這種真相是沒有人說也不敢說的。但現在憑著這種氣氛的呈現,它會逼你接受的。

是甚麽真相呢?

是五位大學校長被逼辭職嗎?是幾個主任的私人網上聊天竟被發現了嗎?僅僅一句話:「有趣是$$$$可以做甚麽」,這些主任就被捉到了,被迫休假,最後還是解職。

還有那種可以隨時傳喚任何人來聆訊的權力,而所追查的並非你所犯何事,而只是你的思想。甚至不是你的思想,而僅僅只是你的思想的「傾向」。

但是 - - - -

請注意,以上並非要點。以上所言,全不重要。

要點是更重要一萬倍的大事。

這一件超大事件,比任何其他國際重大事件都重要得多。

全部的世界大局,都己經被這一件事扭轉。

那就是: 以色列財團所控制的秘密力量,己經完全掌握了美國。美國所行的方向,己經明確鐵定了。

甚麼方向?

削除中國的支幹(例如俄國和伊朗等等),一塊一塊的摘除樹葉(作家、藝術家、歌唱家),剝掉中國的靈魂。經濟戰爭在先,局部戰爭並行,最終目的,如果你不信,也無所謂了。

因為你己經不存在。


8/15/2024

What will you do? If one of your arm is tied up by your enemy?



What will you do? If one of your arm is tied up by your enemy?


Now the US is attacking Russia with their Ukrainian soldiers.......


Its like attacking a tree.


Branches were cut away one by one.


There will be no branch and no leaves in the tree......


A writer is but one of the leaves.


But Iran, Russia, and etc. are branches.........


People can expect a day of no arm.


This is a missing point in the Art of War.












Why is it important to ban a reading tool in Hong Kong?

 Why is it important to ban a reading tool in Hong Kong?




I had invented a little tool for people to read faster.  I named the tool a "reading ruler"

It is a simple design to cover the places you have read,  just to keep your mind go forward together with the ideas from the writer.   You link up your idea with the book.  Just like running side by side together with your good friend.   

Readers are easy to tend to going backwards in reading.  Because they are scared.  They are afraid to miss the point of the writer. If they can cover the places they have already read,  then their mind will not be going backwards. And the "route" of the mind will be formed. 作者寫作要一氣呵成,讀者也同樣要一氣呵成。the writer writes in a spirit non-stop, same is the reader to have the spirit going non-stop.


It was such a simple design banned by the secret underground party which was and is  controling  the publishing kingdom of Hong Kong.


I had designed such a simple tool and written a little booklet to explain the reading methods.  I had the promise of the publishing house to sell this "reading ruler"  in Hong Kong by then.

I made the plastic ruler through a local factory and printed 5000 booklets.  The publish house had already accepted them.

I was very happy by then,  expecting some change in the reading minds.

It was like a huge strike when some worker from the publishing house sent the booklets and the reading rulers back to my place. They refused to sell it in Hong Kong.


They had banned it forever.


What does it mean?


When they are painting all Hong Kong red,  they were actually taking away the guts  from Hong Kong.


Same is Hong Kong nowadays.


The external shell is red.  But they would not allow writers  to survive.  The had controlled all mind businesses in Hong Kong by taking away the inner contents from them.

It is the same group of people now promoting a kind of  life style using 金庸 or "Wei Xiaobao" as a model to fix the minds of young people in Hong Kong plus "the world", as mentioned by them.


The shells are red,

fakes fed.

the cells are red,

inner cancer grows.


This is the situation of Hong Kong.


.............

how to improve reading and make it faster:





move the ruler down to cover the place you have read.  do not go back in reading.




Hope you enjoy reading,  if you can find one of my works in a Hong Kong book store.  Good luck to you.













8/12/2024

When My Books were Buried在您的眼皮下




My Books Buried

在您的眼皮下

 


When shells were red

When fakes were fed

Books never read

Now even the cells are red

Inner cancer grows 



             Leechard 2024, Aug





only the burial is a fact

真假莊子(三冊)

明天誰會富起來(中國精神與世界大勢)

莊子宇宙(三冊)

莊子寓言

李察寓言  Fables

Art of War   莊子兵法

我是爸爸

心魔集

讀書尺(一種加速閲讀的小工具)


o

8/08/2024

a poem: Behind the light

 


The moon's phases, in ignorance, kindle thought

Clear light conceals poetic depths from behind

From a tranquil corner, the lunar soil is sought

Where the primal truth of time does unfold

(Translated into Classical British English with the help of AI)


寧靜的月亮背後


月相無知啟亮思

清光背後意有詩

擷取寧靜一方土

容納原始真象時


       2024.8.6.


8/04/2024

When you were at gunpoint of your enemy




The Iranians knew it better than many other people.

And you never know when will your enemy pull the trigger.

You can only panic,  and if you still have a little time,  you can read.

Read how the Percian defeated by the Greeks.
Its not a war between countries.

It is a war between cultures.

It is a war of philosophies more than guns.

All you need is a wake up from the sweet dream of the old days.

Gun points are only external threat.  If you can visualize the internal threat,  you are very likely the final winner.

We are all under some threats nowadays.  The internal one needs more attention.  They are utmost important.

8/01/2024

Is Wei Xiaobao a "cool guy"?

 

殖民時期的香港,盡人皆知,有許多許多的「叻仔」。

這些「叻仔」都身光頸靚(這香港名詞,外邊人都知道。)  而且站出來像個「尖頭鰻」gentleman, 腦袋削尖,會鑽營,身軀滑滑的像條鰻魚,游走於官場商鋪,撈得風生水起。識撈何解?就是鑑貌辨色,捕捉空氣,趨吉避凶,見水發財。

這些叻仔們,通街通巷,觸目皆是。大家見到,都心知肚明,會心微笑。

肚是會「明」的麽?

自從韋小寶出現,叻仔們奔走相告。

也不知,到底韋小寶的老師,是不是即是殖民地叻仔?

韋小寶受寵於皇室,更受竉於隱隱現現的群中,有好戯看了。

(本來還想寫下去的,手機愈來愈慢,錯字多過正字,恐怕綱絡高手們不耐煩了,一按鍵把李察打爆也吧。)


舊文新讀


5/12/2008


正負面的中式思維,有何不同?

-

正負面的中式思維,有何不同?
(問到底 No。7030 2008 0513 Tuesday)


上周六的問題是:憤怒青年、維園阿伯、街坊組長、紅衛兵、香港叻仔和「我」之間,有甚麼相同與
不相同?


在外面人的眼界看,好像一樣。但其實,中國人的思維方式,有兩大類。


中式思維,有正面有負面。


正面的中式思維,以遠古神話和莊子為代表。發展到後來,就是紅樓夢的悲情,然後是孫中山的憤發。
然後就是得來不易,殖民老太爺們恨之刺骨的堀起的現代的富裕的新中國。這一種正面的生命力量,雖然屢受打擊,但從未斷絕。兩千年來,此起彼伏,聲音微弱,但生生不息。


負面的中式思維,就是從孔子、老子到偽莊子的一系列思維規範。日前提及:是非觀念的五種錯誤導向,僅是思維鐵軌。所有斷層人,只能依循這鐵軌思維。這是斷層人的思維特色。


至於供思維運行的鐵軌,舖在甚麼土地上?就是舖在孔子和偽莊子的命運觀念之上:一切命中注定,
只能無奈。


  古老神州是一塊大大的名叫作「無奈」的土地。而土地上,只有一條鐵軌。


若問,火車開往何處?可以孔子的一句話為代表:
「出則事奉公卿,入則事奉父兄。」永遠原地循環,保持穩定,絕對不出軌,也沒有其他目的。


* * *


前述的五種是非觀念,略為解釋如下:

  第一:否定是非。根本不認為有求知的必要。
(在孔子和老子的思想系統中,「知識」並無位置。孔子所謂「求學」,不過是重複溫習孔子的封建倫理道德。孔子從不理會現實環境中的任何問題。但正面的中式思維並不這樣:屈原徹底追問大自然的原理。莊子主張精研規律,以無厚入有間。對付大自然,是遊刃有餘。)


第二:如果要談是非,則世界上只有一是一非。忠君愛國的,就是「是」,其他就是「非」。
(孟子的文章,慷慨激昂,要人分清大是大非。但孟子的是非,並不是研究宇宙萬物的原理真相對錯,而是忠君愛國。孟子的好學生是岳飛和文天祥。)


第三:是非的唯一標準,掌握在長輩亦即官吏手中。
(儒學主張「無違」,亦即「聽話」,已經形成絕對的思維習慣。波斯人以閹人為師,中國人以吏為師,並不止於秦朝。「奉旨」、「聽命」,才是真理的標準。「以吏為師」,是兩千年來的痛苦困局。)


第四:把是非跟善惡等同。所有「是」的,就是好的,應該加以保護。所有「非」的,就是壞的,應該加以打擊。


第五:把是非作為分類的標準:所有同意我的,是自己人。所有不同意我的,就是敵人。


………

3 則留言

  1. 文章的思維,好似我的老師,我地的政府。

  2. 何謂精研規律? 精力研究各種事物的規律嗎? 這不是西方思想嗎?

    Peggy

  3. ★ 為甚麼「我們」偏多天災?

    ★ 如果天災碰上了奧運怎麼辦?

    ★ 莊子會怎樣解釋天災?

    親愛的李察先生,

    如你將會說一些懷疑是反中國, 反奧運, 之類的話, 好可能會害我們已後不能再看到你的文章了. ..










Is Wei Xiaobao a "cool guy"叻仔?


During the colonial era in Hong Kong, it was well known that there were many "cool guys".

These "cool guys" all had a good appearance 身光頸靚(this is a Hong Kong term, outsiders are all familiar with.) and stood out like a "gentleman", with a sharp head, adept at maneuvering, body sleek like an eel, navigating through officialdom and businesses, making a fortune. Knowing how to make a profit? It's about reading faces, sensing the atmosphere, seeking good fortune and avoiding bad luck, and getting rich.

These cool guys were everywhere, seen by everyone, and everyone knew exactly what they were about, sharing knowing smiles.

Can one really "know" the truth?

Ever since Wei Xiaobao appeared, the cool guys have been very excited and spreading the word quickly.

I wonder, could Wei Xiaobao's teacher possibly be one of the colonial cool guys? or vice versa?

Wei Xiaobao was favored by the royalty, and highly supported by the emerging and mysterious groups, it will provide more good entertainment later.
 
(I wanted to continue writing, but my phone is getting slower, more typos than correct words, afraid the internet experts might get impatient, might as well just press a button and blast Leechard away.)





Old Text, New Interpretation

5/12/2008

What are the differences between positive and negative Chinese thinking?
-

What are the differences between positive and negative Chinese thinking?
(Question No. 7030 2008 0513 Tuesday)

The question from last Saturday was: What are the similarities and differences between the angry youth, the elder in Victoria Park, the neighborhood leaders, the Red Guards, the Hong Kong cool guys, and "me"?

From an outsider's perspective, they all seem similar. But in reality, Chinese thinking can be divided into two major categories.

Chinese thinking has both positive and negative aspects.

Positive Chinese thinking is represented by ancient mythology and Zhuangzi. As it developed further, it became the tragic story of Dream of the Red Chamber, then the fervor of Sun Yat-sen. Following that was the hard-won prosperity of modern China that the colonial masters despised. This positive life force, though often battered, has never been extinguished. Over two thousand years, it has been rising and falling, with a faint voice but an enduring spirit.

Negative Chinese thinking follows a series of thought norms from Confucius, Laozi to pseudo-Zhuangzi. As mentioned before: the five erroneous orientations of the concept of right and wrong are just mental tracks. All fragmented individuals can only follow this line of thought. This is the characteristic of fragmented thinking.

And as for the tracks that guide this thinking, where are they laid? They are laid on the concepts of fate from Confucius and pseudo-Zhuangzi: everything is predetermined, and one can only resign to fate.

Ancient China is a land named "Wu Nai無奈(i can do nothing)". And on this land, there is only one track.

If one were to ask, where is the train heading? One can take Confucius's words as representation: "Serve the public officials when outside, serve the father and brothers when inside." Forever circling in place, maintaining stability, never derailing, with no other purpose.

* * *

The aforementioned five concepts of right and wrong are briefly explained as follows:

First: Deny right and wrong. There is fundamentally no need for seeking knowledge.
(In the thought systems of Confucius and Laozi, "knowledge" has no place. Confucius's so-called "learning" is merely a repetition of Confucian ethical values. Confucius never paid attention to any problems in the real environment. But positive Chinese thinking is not like this: Qu Yuan thoroughly sought the principles of nature. Zhuangzi advocated studying rules, entering the realm of existence from emptiness. Dealing with nature was effortless.) *refer to the Chinese test.

Second: In discussing right and wrong, there is only one right and one wrong in the world. Being loyal to the emperor and loving the country is "right", everything else is "wrong".
(Mencius's writings are passionate, urging people to distinguish between right and wrong. But Mencius's concept of right and wrong does not involve studying the principles and truths of the universe, but rather loyalty to the emperor and love for the country. Mencius's good students are Yue Fei and Wen Tianxiang.)

Third: The only standard for right and wrong lies in the hands of the elders or officials.
(Confucianism advocates "no violation", that is, "obedience", which has become an absolute thinking habit. Persians have eunuchs as teachers, Chinese have officials as teachers, a practice not limited to the Qin Dynasty. "Following orders" is the standard of truth. "Taking officials as teachers" has been a painful dilemma for two thousand years.)

Fourth: Equate right and wrong是非 with good and evil善惡. 
(rigst and wrong = good and evil)
Everything that is "right" is good and should be protected. Everything that is "wrong" is bad and should be fought against.


Fifth: Use right and wrong 是非as the standard for classification: Those who agree with me are my own people. Those who disagree with me are enemies.




3 Comments

nightingale on May 13, 2008 at 1:33 PM
The thinking in the article is like that of my teacher and our government.

Anonymous on May 13, 2008 at 4:55 PM
What is the essence of studying regulations? Is it about studying the regulations of various things? Isn't this a Western concept?
Peggy

Anonymous on May 13, 2008 at 10:42 PM
- Why are "we" more prone to natural disasters?
- What if a natural disaster occurs during the Olympics?
- How would Zhuangzi explain natural disasters?
Dear Mr. Li, if you are going to say something that may be suspected of being anti-China, anti-Olympics, etc., it is very likely that we may not be able to see your articles again in the future.









......



....

.....