Every thing has its inner and outer side. In the case of democracy, if we
could view it from the inner side, much of the problem would be clear.
One question:
Drone usage. Do drones eliminate terrorist or produce
them?
According to a report in 2013.7.3. from the
BBC, “Drones Strikes are a source of severe tension between the US and
Pakistan. It is estimated that between 2004 and 2013, CIA drone attacks in
Pakistan killed up to 3460 people. About
890 of them were civilians and the vast majority of strikes were carried out by
the Obama administration, research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism
said.”
And the feelings are not easily obtainable
from the West. What would be the direct result of such attacks? It is
hatred. And hatred is the fuel for
terrorism. Drones are doing a very bad job;
they are counter-productive, achieving the opposite result.
Another example.
19 brave firefighters killed in central
Arizona wild fire. They have nowhere to
go suddenly, and were buried into the fire. In the most urgent moments, will
there be a drone coming to help them? Will there be some kind of robotic tank,
carrying water cannons and different sorts of heavy machinary, running to their
help? Will there be rockets, water carrying CO2
bombs, bomb into the bushes and eliminate the fire quickly?
All answers are negative. As all the drones
and rockets and tanks are to create fire, not to eliminate fire. Yet they are
too far away, not in Arizona, but in Pakistan.
And the question remains:
Why do wise political people do opposite
things always? Are they not wise enough?
We need to look into the soul of democracy.
It is something happened deep in the soul
of democracy.
Democracy is external structure people put
into their group behavior. It all
depends on the group mind, or we call that a soul, or HTS (human thinking
system).
Leaders usually act according to the frame
of structure. The smarter they are, the more wrong they would be, if the soul
were misleading.
The US is an important example for this.
Deep in the bottom of the Declaration of Independence, there is NO true equality,
and the spirit of it is the traditional kind:
Eye for eye (it is so called justice, not to be argue with), and the
word “hatred” is omitted, as well as the word “love”, however, omitting love,
is to allow “justice” to be done without other consideration, as the common
passion of human love is excluded. It says that life, freedom, and the right to
seek pleasure are self-evident. What does self-evident mean? It means a truth
doesn’t need proof. But it might have missed a lot other rights, for example,
The right to seek not pleasure but truth, and
the right to love and to be loved are also self-evident.
Deep in the minds of the early American,
they simply couldn’t view things from a universal view, and to love even your
enemy is out of the question. You need only to beat them.
Why is terrorism so difficult to handle?
Spirit of hatred is the reason. And drones
are just the tools for creating more terrorists, not less.
We are talking about the souls of
democracy, and that is seldom mentioned. People just like to talk about the
“mature” kind of democracy. It seems the structure of democracy could develop
from a naïve kind to a mature kind. But if you can see the soul inside the
structure is decisive, you will search painfully for a better view for it.
We all need a change. To change what? Our
soul.
* response: WhatsApp (852)9186-4286 (Leechard)
or email academy2008@hotmail.com
or email academy2008@hotmail.com
8551 What is the soul of democracy.doc20130703
沒有留言:
發佈留言