20250303
What if manpower has actually become redundant?
Maybe Elon Musk and Donald Trump have actually saw this problem.
But they saw it in another way.
The question is very well, indeed:
"What did you do last week?"
If you can't answer this question, you have to go.
And you might ask another question:
"What did you do in your whole life?"
What if you cannot answer that question?
Yes, it is an important question to ask yourself.
Every one must search for the meaning of life once, at least in their life time.
It is philosophy.
But it is easy to answer for that question.
You only change the word me into we, and you'll find the answer more easily.
Do not ask what am I going to do?
Please ask: "what are we going to do?"
Or "what are we humans going to do?"
If you have a mind like that, you might find the answer is in somewhere else.
Yes, we are going to help each other, we are going to search for the meaning of the universe, we have to explore about the universe and ourselves.
Before we find everything, at least we can find one thing: That we can do everything on the condition that we love each other.
And now the question is:
"What if manpower has become redundant?"
The real essence of this problem is that:
Only a few can control the technique in science and produce all the things with machines. Other people without the technique of science has become redundant.
Those people in power will not consider anything like arts or philosophy or history or anything else from the money making technique of science.
If you are redundant you have to go. You have to leave the planet.
What do you call this?
Can you call them genius?
Maybe they are genius in a way.
Actually, they cannot see the real essence of this problem.
The real problem is:
"What if manpower has become redundant?"
This is not the sole problem of the United States, it will become the problem of all human beings in the near future.
No one is redundant. If you can think in a broader sense of art, history, literature, music, and all the many studies about the future of the universe.
What do you think? If you think only the money making subjects like computer sciences can be kept and all the others studies like poetries should be discarded because they are wasting money and poets should not be allowed to live.......that means what?
That means they are wrong.
And it is happening in front of your eyes.
It is the source of the future destruction of this planet.
And I have to repeat it once more:
There will not be a manpower redundant situation in this planet.
We humans need to work together in love to search for the meaning of this universe: And before that: To search for the meaning of love in living in this universe.
It is so simple. Yet it is so difficult...........
Please check the following to see how the American way of thinking has been developing recently......
What Strategy Has Obama Prepared?
(Question No. 8017, January 27, 2011, Thursday)
Obama's recent congressional speech essentially focused on one word: "competition." He stated the need to strengthen America's competitiveness, asserting that the United States is capable of facing competition from any country on Earth, including China and India.
He appointed the CEO of General Electric to chair a committee aimed at enhancing U.S. competitiveness. Perhaps he believes that General Electric is a more tangible company with actual products. In reality, over half of the company's products are not manufactured in the United States, and more than half of its resources are allocated to other investment areas, making manufacturing a secondary aspect of the business.
Some American columnists argue that he has misdiagnosed the issue.
The problem with the American economy is not a lack of competitiveness. When it comes to manufacturing any product, from airplanes to the iPhone 4, which country can truly compete with the United States? Perhaps Japanese cars can compete, but the production lines for Japanese cars have long been cleverly relocated to the U.S. Japanese cars are essentially made in America.
So where does the problem lie?
An urgent real issue is that the development patterns of Western economies are unbalanced. A small number of high-tech knowledge and skills are concentrated in the hands of a few, while the majority cannot keep up. This is known as the knowledge gap. When the knowledge gap was smaller, production lines could still remain in the U.S. In the era of Edison, light bulbs were undoubtedly assembled by American workers. However, today the knowledge gap is wider; without outsourcing, competition is impossible. Thus, the American phenomenon is that a few people earn a lot of money while the majority rely on welfare and cannot play an active role. Today, wealth in America is concentrated in the hands of just 1% of the population. Most people survive on the welfare benefits that trickle down to them. Of course, this isn’t entirely accurate; it’s a metaphor. Most people do not actually rely solely on welfare. The U.S. has various service industries, etc. But this metaphor helps people understand the issue directly. The inability of the majority to utilize their intelligence is the most severe problem.
The second issue is the problem inherent in American culture. Americans pursue happiness rather than ideals. They seek opportunities instead of enlightenment. They engage in cutthroat competition rather than fostering love for one another. Originally, this was merely an ethical issue. "Morality" has always been considered a "high ground," viewed as a weapon for struggle between parties. However, it is precisely because of this moral framework that Americans have lost the opportunity to break through the bottleneck. The renewal of American culture seems far off. While for many, cultural renewal may not be important, what matters is that the president's competitive strategy may not be able to save the economy. If Obama fails in this regard, investors will have to reconsider their plans.
The third issue is that American culture cannot lead Western culture out of its bottleneck. There is no understanding or interest in the concepts of internal and external, left brain and right brain. Yet American leaders are interested in pushing the Chinese to follow Confucius's path to destruction, even as they fail to see any merits in Chinese culture.
